Advertisement
It is offensive to even use their names in the same sentance. And so now I am offensive, but the point had to be made.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Fri, October 29, 2004 - 10:18 PMWell that is very true. And Blink 187 is not Punk Rock.;) Lol!
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Fri, October 29, 2004 - 10:51 PMHow can you deny the similarities? I'm a huge lover of Joy Division for close to twenty years, the the resemblance is there. -
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Fri, October 29, 2004 - 10:56 PMWell there is. But I will tell you one thing...There is no Chameleons influence in there by far! -
-
Unsu...
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Sun, November 7, 2004 - 9:46 PMThere is a band that does touch on what Joy division was doing but not imitating them either. check out Citizen Bird, if you get a chance.
-
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Mon, November 8, 2004 - 5:01 PMcitizen bird is great. they're from sweden. I was getting more shoegaze/psych vibes from them more than joy divisiony vibes, though. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Tue, November 9, 2004 - 11:55 AMHmmm, perhaps we're listening to different albums, or different perceptions. Songs like "Joy" & "Magnetic City" I didn't see as being that way.
-
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Thu, June 30, 2005 - 7:36 PMThe Lies are probably the closest
band that i would compare to
joy division. i'll check out Citizen
Bird. i don't think interpol is anything
like joy division. there is no punk
in their DNA. i think warshaw's
transformation wasn't entirely
a conscious one. not to say
that interpol was entirely conscious
of their band's sound either, but
joy division's sound is a bit heavier,
and i think that's because of warshaw.
interpol, well it sounds a bit more
popish, not as heavy. no interpol
is never joy divison.
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Sun, November 28, 2004 - 2:47 PMThe one thing that drew me to try to listen to Interpol was that infamous comparison to Joy Division, and---for the exception of one song off their first album---none of their music really reminded me of JD. Too much guitar, in my opinion.
IMHO, what separates Joy Division from other post-punk contemporaries is the sparse but melodic use of guitar, and of course, Hooky's soaring melodic bass lines. Morris' driving rhythms propelled their songs and Curtis' provocative lyrics topped the cake.
NOT that every good post-punk/post-modern rock band *HAS* to sound like JD: but you have to admit, there are few (if any) bands that come close to the sound that JD has/had. -
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Sun, December 19, 2004 - 8:33 AMi think interpol gets off on the comparison even though they claim they sound nothing like em...true true...there new album is even further testament to that... i wouldnát even buy it...there like an american translation of slick eurotrash with nice guitars...i paid 12 dollars to see them once and then a few months later without a new album to support they were charging 18......they should make some post modern screenprinted t shirts in berlin and stenciul "were only in it for the dark hearted chicks and the money"....
can u say contrived...
no basis of comparison to JD...ever
dru dat -
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Mon, December 20, 2004 - 12:47 PMThe thing that makes me smile... an Interpol member says that they hadn't heard Joy Division before starting to play together... I'm not very certain of this...
-
-
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Tue, December 21, 2004 - 10:56 AMI totally agree with you. Interpol could never be Joy Division or as good as they were. Interpol has like 1 good song. They're a generic band and the feeling there music gives me isn't genuine, no offense to those who are fans of Interpol..
-
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Fri, January 14, 2005 - 7:21 AM"were only in it for the dark hearted chicks and the money"....
HA! I'll take one! -
-
customer at the bar I dj at
Mon, January 17, 2005 - 4:22 PMasked me if I played interpol. I was getting bored and it was close to the end of the night. someone requested HEART AND SOUL and I decided to play the whole second side of CLOSER and have a beer. I could have gone ballistic, but it just ain't worth it anymore. So instead I calmly explained that I was playing Joy Division and the singer from Interpol is trying to sound like Ian Curtis and that's why she thought I played Interpol. She said, "oh". -
-
Re: customer at the bar I dj at
Thu, January 20, 2005 - 2:31 PMHaving just recently heard some Interpol I can see where some might think the two are similar.. but those of us that can tell the difference it's as night and day really.. the singer is trying to sound like Ian... TRYING...but falls short in my opinion.. they are not bad .. but definately not Joy Division -
-
Re: customer at the bar I dj at
Thu, January 20, 2005 - 10:01 PMThe thing that gets me is that people say there is Chameleons influences. Which there are none what so ever! -
-
Re: customer at the bar I dj at
Mon, February 14, 2005 - 5:21 PMyou don't think the chugging guitars on TURN ON THE BRIGHT LIGHTS are maybe just a little chameleon-esque?
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Thu, February 3, 2005 - 4:53 PMI am a fan of both and I don't think Inerpol sounds like Joy Division at all. I do think people make the comparison because of some of the feel of the music, or really for a lack of being able to describe it to someone who doesn't know. I tell people its Joy Division meets Coldplay; they usually get that.
Joy Division is way more intense, and Interpol is way more melodic and melencholy...I guess.
-
Unsu...
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Sun, February 6, 2005 - 7:28 PMAfter hearing so many people compare them to Joy Division, I wanted to hate Interpol. After hearing their albums though, I think they sound pretty decent. I can see the music comparisons only in that Interpol's music is danceable and dark. The lyrics are lacking though. Ian Curtis usually managed to be fairly universal in his songs. Interpol seem more interested in relationship songs and narrower personal themes, which is alright, but for me, it just has less emotional weight to it. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Mon, May 23, 2005 - 6:22 PMThe guitars are on the first Interpol album are straight out of Script of the Bridge, so I have to agree with the Chameleon comparisons. The vocals are very Ian, but the lyrics are not.
What Interpol reminds me most of is a lot of these bands that were playing that style in Boston in the early 80's, like Primary Colors and Ice Age. Also, bands like early Comsat Angels, the Sound, UK Decay, Scars, etc. -
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Tue, May 24, 2005 - 7:37 PMI don't hear it Chris.
And I have been a Chameleons fan for a longtime.
To each his own. -
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Wed, May 25, 2005 - 10:53 AMWell, I like them both... and I think Interpol may not be totally original, but it's important to remember that they're making music at a completely different time in musical history. They are drawing on a whole library of available musical sounds that exist now, thanks to the pioneering of JD, U2, Smiths... and even '90s bands like Afghan Whigs and Blonde Redhead. I Don't really think that Interpol sounds like anyone else, they just have a sound that's appropriate for the current trends, and people are paying attention to it because the '80s retro thing is back in full swing.
I went to an all ages Interpol show last year, and they sounded OK, but I like the CD better than the live show. What I was most struck by was the crowd. I mean, I was a little kid in the '80s, but I remember the music and the fashion first hand... but here I was in an auditorium full of 16 year olds, all dressed in full '80s regalia! It blows my mind... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Fri, May 27, 2005 - 1:14 AMI like em both too, when you compare them to all the other bands that have come out in the last 10 years they are in my top 10. I feel they are one of the bands that brings hope that maybe music can still be good?
-
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Mon, October 24, 2005 - 11:00 AMI'm with Chris. I don't see how anyone can't see how much Interpol resembles The Chameleons, musically anyway if not lyrically. The JD comparisons are odious and just plain lazy journalism.
I'd like to think I know from whence I speak - I've been a JD fanatic since 1978 (I own original copies - all bought new when released - of FAC 2 "A Factory Sampler", the "An Ideal For Living" 12" and the Sordide Sentimentale 7", among others) and had a ticket to see Joy Division play at The Starwood in West Hollywood on June 6th, 1980. I also own several Chameleons records and saw them live back on March 20th, 1987 at the Variety Arts Theater in downtown LA.
To me, the Interol-Chameleons similarities are undenyable.
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Sat, April 1, 2006 - 9:41 AM"I don't hear it Chris.
And I have been a Chameleons fan for a longtime."
they sound so much alike, at times, that it's almost silly.
Check out the song 'A Person Isn't Safe Anywhere These Days'... the guitar changes after the chorus, "men of steel"
also check out the drum beat of 'In Shreds' and tell me that doesn't sound like 'PDA'.
just in general, they both have a very, very similar feel musically. -
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Sat, April 1, 2006 - 3:27 PMYou think?
Really, I do not.
They sound more a bit like Joy Division then anything brother. -
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Mon, April 3, 2006 - 2:38 PMvocally, i think paul resembles joy division in tone... that's about it. musically, interpol resembles the chameleons. i wouldn't say they are ripping them off but it sure as hell sounds like they listened to them a lot.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Fri, May 27, 2005 - 11:51 PMand Creed is not Pearl Jam, Chevelle is not Tool, Gwen Stefani is not Madonna, and Dan Quayle is not JFK. =) -
-
Unsu...
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Sun, July 10, 2005 - 3:11 PMI can hear the reason why they are compared. "Hands Away" to me has overtones of JD. I like both bands, although this is probably the wrong Tribe to admit that :)
One thing I will say though is this about JD. I have a shed load of 'band tshirts' collected over the ages, and the only tshirt that anyone ever says anything about is my JD one. Its long faded and hardly recognizable anymore, but there are a hardcore set of fans that give me a 'nice shirt' in passing.
Just a little sunday afternoon anecdote to share...
-
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Mon, September 12, 2005 - 1:38 PMOk so I am little late in this reply...but the resemblence is DEFIANANTLY there? No, Interpol will NEVER be Joy Division because ..they are Interpol..whats up people? YOur undying devotion is just a bunch of closed doors..
-
Re: Interpol is not Joy Division..
Fri, October 21, 2005 - 5:45 AMand I couldn't agree more with both of those statements...